Having
dealt with the issue of the better ministry of Christ as High Priest, the
author turned now to focus on the Covenant that He had ratified with His Blood.
His main purpose was to show the superiority of this Covenant. Hence, in verses
6-9, he gave reasons for the necessity of the New Covenant; in verses 10-12, he
showed the four superior promises of the New Covenant before underscoring the
certainty of the change in verse 13.
Verse
6 began by showing that the superiority of Christ’s ministry as High Priest
rested on the superiority of the Covenant. In comparison with the Mosaic
Covenant, this one was more superior because it rested on two things: more
superior promises and a better mediator. Unlike the Old Testament that was
mediated through angels and Moses; the Mediator of this New Covenant.is none
other than the Lord Jesus Christ.
Verse 7 gives the first reason by stating that: had the first
covenant and its promises been adequate and flawless, there would be no
necessity for a second one. This implied that the first covenant had faults;
hence, the need for another. Therefore, in verse 8, God declared that He would
make a New Covenant with the house of Israel and Judah .
Verse 9 then shows that the New Covenant to be made with Israel
would be unlike the first. In the Old Covenant, the people of Israel had
failed God and that made it necessary for a new one. Hence, God gave the
promise of a New Covenant. In the first covenant given by Moses, the people
were not empowered to keep the covenant and they did not stay faithful to God.
Now in the New Covenant, believers would have the ability to stay faithful to
God. The Laws of God would not be engraved in stones but in hearts instead. Besides,
God’s abiding presence would also be in the believers. This would make the
second covenant different from the first.
In verses 10-12, the author delineated four promises made to the
people in the New Covenant: (1) they would know God’s will and desire to do it
- verse 10; (2) they would enjoy a privilege and unique relationship with God -
verse 11; (3) they would know God personally - verse 11; and (4) they would
experience permanent forgiveness of sins - verse 12.
Here, the author contrasted the two covenants God had made with
the people. The first one, the Mosaic covenant, had become obsolete, as it was
growing old. The destruction of the temple in AD 70 literally brought this to
pass. The temple, the rituals and everything attached to it, were destroyed and
the Jews were scattered throughout the world. The New Covenant was enacted at the death of Jesus
Christ. Hence, the basis of the New Covenant was the death and Blood of Jesus
Christ our Lord. This New Covenant had only been partially fulfilled. We must
bear in mind that the New Covenant was made with the house of Israel and the
house of Judah ,
not with the Church. The part of the New Covenant offered to us is salvation.
The rest of the Covenant will find its fulfillment in the millennial kingdom. The Apostle Paul affirmed it in Romans 9-11. Paul taught that at that time, God
would gather Israel
and they would be reunited with Him again. We need to know that God did not
eliminate the promise He made to Abraham
although the Old Covenant was terminated.
In the Old Covenant, knowing God was only in
the realm of the intellect, but in the New Covenant and with Christ Jesus, we
can know God intimately. There is a knowing that leads to a longing. Are we
there?
There is a
longing, only You can fill
A raging
tempest, only You can still
My heart
is thirsty Lord
To know You
as I’m known
Drink from
the river
That flows
before Your Throne
Draw me
deeper
Deeper in
love with You
Jesus hold
me close
In Your embrace
Draw me
deeper
Deeper than
I’ve ever been before
I just
want to know you
More and
more
How I long
to be
Deeper in
love.
No comments:
Post a Comment