Like
Nathan, the woman from Tekoa, instructed by Joab, told David a story with the
objective of getting him to allow Absalom, his banished son, to come home. The
story as we have learned from 2 Samuel 14:4-7 was about that woman’s two sons
who fought with each other while working in the field together. One of
them killed the other in the fight. And now all the members of her family were
demanding that the woman hand over the life of the surviving son. Her dilemma
was that if she did according to their demand, she would be deprived of her
only means of support in life. Besides, her husband would be bereft of someone
to carry on the family name. Here she was seeking David for a decisive action
to end her dilemma.
David
responded by asking her to return home first and he would give her an answer
later concerning what to do. He was trying to delay giving any judgment. But
like the persistent widow in Jesus’ parable in Luke 18:2-8 on the unjust judge,
the woman refused to let him procrastinate. She would not leave until an answer
was forthcoming. What the woman said in verse 9 seems to imply that David was
unwilling to be involved in the guilt by judging on the matter. The lady then
assured David that she would bear the sole responsibility for whatever guilt
resulting from his decision. Realizing that he could not delay the judgment, David
asked her to bring those who were pressuring her to him, and he would order them
to stop harassing her. Even that did not satisfy that woman. She persistently
pressed the king in the name of God for an assurance that her surviving son
would go unharmed. David was cornered into assuring her that not a single hair
on the surviving son’s head would fall to the ground, thus guaranteeing that
her son would be saved.
Wisely,
in verses 12-14, the woman then made the application of the story by first
seeking permission from David to speak. The king assertively told her to say
what was in her mind. Then she boldly pointed to the king’s inconsistency
without mentioning Absalom’s name. She asked him why he was willing to assure
the safety of her surviving son yet would not ensure the safe return of his own
banished son. In so doing, David was not exercising mercy. He was in fact doing
harm to the people of God by not pardoning and allowing his son, the favorite
of the people, to return. She continued to reason with David saying that death
would come upon everyone. Once a person died, he or she would be like water
spilled on the ground that could not be gathered back again. She was probably alluding
to the death of Amnon here. In the last part of verse 14, we see how it was applied
to David. Though the king deserved to die, for taking the life of Uriah yet God
found a way to let him live and be reconciled to Him. Therefore David could emulate
God and find a way to allow his banished son to return, though he rightly
deserved death.
The account here points us to God’s mercy. All of us, like David and Absalom, are
sinners and fallen short of God’s glory. And for our sin, we all deserve death
because the wages of sin is death. Yet God in His love for us found a way, at
great sacrifice to Himself, to forgive and pardon us in Christ. These verses
call for us to emulate God and be more forgiving and merciful in life. No matter
how much wrong we may have received at the hands of others, we will do well to
find a place in our hearts to be magnanimous, merciful, and forgiving. If we
repay good for evil, we will be doing exactly what God would do. According to
James 2:13, “…judgment will be merciless
to one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment.” So
be merciful!
No comments:
Post a Comment