Though
David allowed Absalom to return to Jerusalem, he did not allow him to come to
court. The pair did not meet or see each other for two full years. Absalom
tried to engage Joab to inquire about the possibility of him meeting up with
the king. Both his attempts proved to be unsuccessful. The commander just
simply refused to engage him. Absalom then resorted to burning his barley field
that was next to his own. Immediately Joab responded and came to see him. The
renegade son of David then demanded to know when he would be restored to the
court. He reasoned that if the king thought he was guilty then execute him.
Absalom wanted the king to decide one way or the other; to kill him or else
restore him to his position. Having engaged Absalom, the general then
appeared before David and somehow managed to convince him to restore Absalom.
The king then called for his son who came and fell prostrate before the father.
No word of repentance from him was recorded. Yet David was moved, and he kissed
his son and everything appeared to be restored on the surface, at least for the
moment.
Absalom
had shown himself to be a self-centered and mean person. For what he had done
to Amnon, he knew he justly deserved death. That was why he fled to seek refuge
with his maternal grandfather. It is true that David did not do right by not
taking Amnon to task for raping Tamar, but Absalom did worst by taking matters
into his own hand to murder the brother in cold blood. Despite being brought
back from exile to Jerusalem, Absalom was unappreciative. He was demanding to
be restored to his former position and was seeking his own personal advantage
at all costs. He even had the audacity to burn down his benefactor’s field
just to force an audience with his father, the king. He was virtually demanding
that his father should forgive and justify him despite all that he had done.
David in some sense was an indulgent father and did not know how to deal with
him, so he reconciled with him. He was obviously oblivious of what his son was
up to.
The lesson that can be learned here is objectivity. Absalom lacked it when he
demanded to be restored to his former position despite all that he had done. He
should have shown gratitude for being spared and given a new lease of life. But
so self-centered was he that he demanded to be treated as if he had done
nothing wrong. That is a clear lack of objectivity. David was equally
unobjective. Especially when it comes to his sons. He should have dealt with
both Amnon and then with Absalom impartially, but he did not because they were
his sons. He was discerning in other matters, but when it had to do with his
children, he seemed to have lost his ability to reason logically. Objectivity
demands that one be impartial regardless of who one is dealing with. If we are
to be objective, we need to nurture a Biblically oriented paradigm so that we
will be able to see things from the perspective of God. This will enable us to
make godly and objective decisions. Our love for God and righteous living require
it, so let us go for it.