The apprehension of the commanders of the Philistines was not baseless. Who would
want to have people of the nation they were fighting with to be at their rear?
What’s worst was the fact that these people were not led by an incompetent man
but David who had slain Goliath and was touted as better than Saul. So they had
every right to be angry with Achish who brought David and his men along and
would even try to justify and defend
him. They all wanted David and his men to return. Since most of them felt that
way, Achish couldn’t help but had to send them back.
What’s
astonishing was that Achish was on David’s side even in such a time. He
felt awkward to explain to David. So he began diplomatically. Calling David, he
said, “As the Lord lives, you have
been upright, and your going out and your coming in with me in the
army are pleasing in my sight; for I have not found evil in you from the
day of your coming to me to this day….”
He told David in no uncertain term that he trusted him completely and felt that
he was upright. This tells us how capable David was at his game. He had
acted so astutely that Achish was completely sold to him. He did not even
detect a hint of disloyalty in David. Notice how Achish even swore by David’s
God. He only saw in David total integrity since the day he came to him. Now
comes the difficult part of broaching the issue with David. He said it was the
other lords who disapproved of David fighting along with them. His
excuse was that he had to submit to the voice of the majority and urge David to
return to Ziklag.
From a spiritual perspective, we know that God was helping David. From
the leadership point of view, Achish was a weak leader. He would not be in such
a predicament had he been more discerning. He should have questioned
David’s intention. But he did not and instead allow David and his men, people
from the opposite camp, to live among them and now to fight alongside them. A
strong and discerning leader would have been more cautious. Achish was also gullible.
He took David’s words hook, line and sinker. He probably was too laid back to
care about checking the facts to find out what David and his men were doing. He
did not and only took David in his words. We also see in Achish that he was not
a team player. He could have told David to return to Ziklag without implicating
his fellow lords. If he were a good team player, he would have communicated the
corporate decision without betraying the rest of the decision-makers. Achish should
have been seen standing as one with the Philistine lords in their decision. But
he was not a team player. He tried to make himself look good to David at the
expense of the rest of the Philistine lords. A non-team player tends to act
this way. They have no regard for corporate decisions. Such a leader would
communicate a hard corporate decision as if he was not part of the decision
making. To have such a leader is dangerous to the organization. The overall
plan of the organization could be sabotaged. We are disciples of the Lord
and working in His kingdom. We must stand as one. Once we have agreed with
the corporate decision of the church, we must live by it and run with it. Let’s
not agree on a thing corporately then communicate as if we are not with the
decision just to gain acceptance and popularity. This shows a lack of integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment