In chapter 6 the apostle dealt with the Corinthians,
concerning a member of the church pursing legal action against one another. The
reason for the dispute was not made clear. But we do know from verse 4 that it
had to do with matters of this life. This phrase “matters of life” suggests
that they were mundane issues of life. The word defraud in verse 7-8 gives the
hint that it could be disagreements over financial matters.
Paul was disturbed by the report of legal tussles in the church. The Corinthians
seemed to have a misplaced sense of justice. Over the incestuous sexual relationship
in the church they were nonchalant but toward ordinary matters of life they
were so uptight. Paul wanted to bring a sense of shame to what they were doing.
The main reason why Paul was disturbed with the Corinthians,
was their failure to take responsibility for one another. Thus, they had failed
as a community. Paul was particularly upset because matters that could
be dealt with among themselves, were brought before an unrighteous judge in the
civil court. The judge was deemed unrighteous because he did not belong to the
covenant community.
By going to a civil court over their legal disputes and
grievances against each other, they were going before pagan courts to settle
their matters. They should instead allow the people of God to deal with and settle
the matter. Paul was puzzled because, if as believers who would ultimately be
judging the world and even angels, why couldn’t they settle such mundane issues
of life? He told them why not suffer wrong and be defrauded, than to do the
wrong thing by going to the civil court to rob another brother.
The civil court in Rome was thought to be partial. The
unrighteous judges had often shown favor to the people who are of higher
status. Furthermore people with means had the ability to bribe the judge as
well. It was possible that those suing their fellow believers in a civil court
were the more well off. Whereas those being brought to court had less financial
means. Paul showed in verse 7 that to have lawsuit against each other was
already a defeat. This was a no win for either. As a whole, the church had lost
even if either of the parties in dispute should win the case. By battling out in
the court against another believer, one would have promoted a wrong, and thus become
a wrong doer. So Paul asked, won’t it be
better to suffer wrong than to be an evil doer?
Magnanimity rightly exercised reflects our Lord better than
when we insist on our rights. The church then, lacked this spirit. Paul’s words
elsewhere urged us to be generous in spirit.
“Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of
all men, If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men.”
(Romans 12:17-18)
No comments:
Post a Comment