Hearing what Job told Bildad, Zophar became angry. He already
felt that Job had treated his previous speech with contempt. And now he had the
audacity to threaten him and his other friends with the sword of judgement (Job
19:29). Job seemed to have accused God of deserting him yet at the same time
proclaimed that as his Redeemer, He would exonerate him after he had died.
Agitated by Job’s bitterness and inconsistency, Zophar could not remain silent
any longer. So, full of passion, he exploded with his second speech in response
to the things Job told Bildad.
In the first 14 verses, Zophar maintained
that the prosperity of the wicked would be transitory. He was sure that the sweetness
of their sin would turn bitter. Then in verses 15-29, he asserted that while
man could be satisfied quickly by his sinful desires, he would also become sick
of it all and unable to enjoy them. Zophar illustrated graphically with a
picture of a powerful rich man who was made poor and weak suddenly. He was in
fact bluntly and brutally indicating to Job that he was that man.
We can see that unfriendly bantering
is often not only controversial but also irritating. Engaging in it will lead a
person to speak out in exaggeration rather than laying out logical reasons to
substantiate one’s point. There is also this tendency to generate anger leading
one to denigrate another with frustration. In such needless bantering, half-truths
are often mistaken for the whole, a brilliant insight taken for a universal
truth and an occasional idea can be interpreted as a perpetual truth. No wonder
Paul’s advice in Titus 3:9 is to “…avoid foolish controversies … for they are unprofitable and
worthless.”
Thank you for the reminder, Pastor Clarence. It is usually caused by pride. This also tells us that the believer is immature in his faith.
ReplyDelete