Here
Eliphaz described a visitation he had. It came in the form of a dream or a night
vision. It was such a harrowing experience that he was affected much. His bones
were shaken and he was terrified. Even his senses were quickened and he could
feel a breath brushed pass. It was quite unusual that the message should be surreptitiously
deposited. Eliphaz sensed the presence of an indescribable and mysterious figure
though he couldn’t name him. And when he stayed still, he heard a still small
voice asking him two rhetorical questions: the first question was, “Can mankind be just before God?” And the
second, “Can a man be pure before his Maker?” It is unlikely that the
experience Eliphaz had, came from God. Here are three reasons why. Firstly, he
didn’t say with specificity that it was from God; secondly, the message came stealthily;
and thirdly, he painted for us a picture of a God who was totally unconcerned
for man.
From
these verses, we deduce that Eliphaz had two assumptions. Firstly, that man cannot
be right and pure before God. Secondly, that God cannot even trust his angels who
could be flawless, how then could he trust men, who are transient. This is
furthest from the truth. With His help, man can have the capacity to live right
before God. With His assistance, God does trust man to make right decision. For
after all, he had created man in His own image and likeness.
Eliphaz
characterized man as weaklings without considering the fact that each one is
created in the image and likeness of God. Man, after all, is still the highest
of God’s creation. Yes, granted that after the fall, man became mere mortal. And
their mortality is like perishable houses made of clay, with flimsy foundation
of dust. Like moths, men could be crushed as easily. Mankind could also be
broken into pieces like pottery. And like tent, when the cords were pulled out,
they could also be folded. Ultimately man would die without discovering wisdom.
Yet God is mindful of man. Pointedly, Eliphaz was hinting that Job was a mere unwise
mortal man, and he was suffering because he was a sinner.
Forcefully,
Eliphaz had applied what he had experienced onto Job’s situation. He was indeed
presumptuous. It’s plain to see that he had a framework in his mind, and that
he interpreted Job’s suffering in the light of that framework. That’s what a Job’s
comforter would do. They always have pet answers to any given situation without
thinking that every effect in life has its own set of causes. You and I know better,
that to help a person in turmoil, the best thing to do is never to provide pet
answers. With empathy, we should lead and guide a person to accurately assess his situation
and then to place his or her trust in God.
No comments:
Post a Comment