In verses 1-12 Paul is
clearly concerned about the building of the whole body. He had placed priority and
emphasis on prophecy over tongues that were not interpreted. He knew that prophecy
has the potential of ministering to more people. When we come to verses 13-19,
the concern for building up the whole body is still very much on Paul’s mind.
So he said, if one chose to speak in tongue, that person should also pray to be
given the ability to interpret what he had said.
In verse 14, Paul then veered
into talking about tongue being used as a language of prayer. The context here
seems to be in one’s private prayer time. That’s why instead of saying speaking
in tongue, Paul said praying in tongue. Why did he use pray? He had already
established earlier in verse 2 that he who speaks in tongue speaks mysteries to
God. Prayer as we know is speaking to God. So he returned to the fact that when
praying in tongue, one’s mind does not understand the words spoken. Should one
therefore discard praying in tongue in private? No, of course not! Paul’s
remedy is found in verse 15, i.e. to use both. For him the solution was to pray
and sing in the language which his mind understood, and he would also do them
with languages that his mind did not understand.
In verse 16, he returned to
the context of a public gathering and worship. Paul felt that it was better to
pray in a language that everyone understood rather than in a language that no
one could understand. Otherwise how could others who could not understand your language,
agree with your prayer and join you in thanking God. Certainly, you might be
giving thanks to God, but because the others could not understand, they would not
be built up. Then referring to himself
as an example, Paul maintained that he spoke in tongue much more than any of them.
But when in a Christian gathering, he would rather speak fewer words in a
language that all could understand, rather than a lot of words in a language that
they don’t. Why? So that they could be edified.
Praying in tongue is so
misunderstood. Using logical analysis one would avoid using tongue that the
mind cannot understand. Paul here gives us the right perspective. In using tongue,
we speak to God and nothing can be more edifying than speaking and praying to
God. But for the sake of the people attending a meeting, we should prefer the known
language so that more can be benefitted by what we say in prayer. By all means
pray in tongue in private. In public meeting, let’s seek to edify all.
No comments:
Post a Comment