Having discussed the issue, the apostles and elders decided, together with the whole congregation, that they should choose men to return to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas, with the letter that they had written. The reason was obvious - to eliminate suspicion.
They
then chose Judas also called Barsabbas and Silas. These were leading people with
sound reputation. Had Paul and Barnabas returned without the accompanying men from
Jerusalem, they could be accused of having obtained the letter by flattery. This
was a wise move on the part of the Jerusalem Council to remove every sinister
suspicion.
In
the letter that they sent, they also candidly pointed to the trouble makers.
They were people from among them who went there without the leaders’ instruction.
Those trouble makers were condemned for wrongly troubling them with undue teaching
that had unsettled their soul.
The
Jerusalem Council then highlighted two things in verses 25-27. Firstly, they
said that they were in total agreement with Paul and Barnabas. Secondly they
commended these two for their zeal and fervency, and also their great courage
in risking their lives for the sake of the Lord Jesus Christ. And to add weight
to what they had written, they were also sending Judas and Silas to affirm by
word of mouth, what they had written in the letter.
What
they were doing were carefully weighed, and with one mind they felt the witness
of the Holy Spirit not to lay any other extra burden on the Gentile believers, except
for the three things: to abstain from things sacrificed to idols; to abstain
from fornication; and to abstain from eating foods that were strangled.
Paul and Barnabas, accompanied by Judas and Silas, returned
to Antioch. When the congregation had gathered, they had the letter read. What
was written brought great encouragement to the people.
Verse 35 tells us
that the church was not lacking in gifted people. For apart from Paul and
Barnabas, there were many others as well, who continued to preach the word of
the Lord.
This account on the
deliberation of the Jerusalem council teaches us how to resolve conflict in
Christian love and unity. Leaders and members must both be opened to the discussion.
First the issue was clearly stated, then the points of view of both sides were heard.
Arguments were explained and supported by experiences and Scriptures.
Communication must
always be clear to ensure unity. There was honesty on the part of the leaders
and openness to examine the crux of the matter. To admit when they were wrong
and to redress the wrong to right it.
We need to know that
we don’t always have to be right. But we do need always to be honest. There is
no problem that cannot be solved if we face the situation squarely and honestly,
and allow the Holy Spirit the latitude to move and bring resolution to the
issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment